Latest News

How to remove Firefox's dotted outline on BUTTONS as well as links?

Tuesday, November 2, 2010 · 0 comments


Remove Firefox's dotted outline on BUTTONS as well as links?


I can make Firefox not display the ugly dotted focus outlines on links with this:

a:focus {
outline: none;
}
But how can I do this for button tags as well? When I do this:

button:focus {
outline: none;
}


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


if you prefer to use css to get rid of the dotted outline:


*for FireFox*/
input[type="submit"]::-moz-focus-inner, input[type="button"]::-moz-focus-inner
{
border : 0px;
}
/*for IE8 */
input[type="submit"]:focus, input[type="button"]:focus
{
outline : none;
}



Fatwa? What fatwa? - Vir Sanghvi

Tuesday, May 18, 2010 · 0 comments

One of the more difficult things I do is to answer questions nearly every day on my website, www.virsanghvi.com. As people are free to ask me questions on any subject at all, I am often thrown by the kinds of things that crop up. Frequently, somebody will mention a recent event or quote a recent statement and ask me to comment on it. Often I have no idea what they are talking about. And when I am abroad, the disconnect becomes even more painful.

Fortunately, I get many more questions each day than I can answer and so I can pick and choose the ones I want not just on the grounds of relevance and general interest but also so that they reflect what I do know rather than what I do not.

Over the last few days, I have been mystified by questions about a fatwa from Darul Uloom Deoband about working women. According to my questioners, who were quoting news reports, the Deobandis had issued a fatwa saying that it was illegal, according to Shariat, for a family to accept a woman’s earnings. This law flowed from the Shariat prohibition of the proximity of men and women in the workplace. Muslim women should not work in offices where they have to talk to men or appear without veils.

I was mildly surprised by the reports but not shocked. These days every crank issues a fatwa of some regressive nature so the content did not surprise me. But Darul Uloom Deoband? I thought those guys were trying to be more liberal these days.

Then, on Monday morning, I came across an excellent article by Syeda Hameed in the Indian Express on this issue. She was intrigued by the fatwa and tried to track its origins.

She discovered that the department of Darul Uloom that issues fatwas is called Darul Ifta. Just as my website has a section in which questions on all subjects are answered, so does Darul Ifta. Hamid says that these questions “read much like questions to agony aunts and their clones in popular magazines. And the answers are much like the magazine answers.” Which is not how I would describe the questions and answers on my own website but I guess that all of us who agree to answer questions on everything set ourselves up for such scorn and even religious organisations are not exempt.

One of the questions on the Darul Ifta website was as follows, “Can Muslim women in India do government or private jobs? Shall their salary be halaal or haraam?”

To which, the junior cleric in charge of answering questions that day responded: “It is unlawful for Muslim women to do a job in the government or private sector where men and women work together and women have to talk to men frankly and without a veil. But Allah knows best.”

You can draw your own conclusions about this answer. If Allah knows best, then why is this fellow offering his own two bits? Why is it unlawful for women “to talk to men frankly”? Is it better if they tell the odd lie instead? And of course, who the hell are these guys to hold forth on what Muslims should do? Who appointed them guardians of the community?

But, here’s the thing: nowhere does the cleric say that the salary is haraam. Yes, that was part of the question but it was not a part that was ever answered.

So, why was this the focus of so many news reports? Why did nobody focus on the fact that the answer ends with “Allah knows best” which Hameed interprets as meaning: “This is my opinion. You decide for yourself because Allah knows best.”

And why do so many people believe that an answer on a website constitutes a fatwa? It is quite clear that no fatwa was ever issued. So, why report it as such?

These are valid questions and they lead to Hameed’s conclusion that “stereotypes were re-affirmed in the minds of many unthinking readers”.

As Hameed concedes, the content of the answer is objectionable. She argues that it is also not supported by the tenets of Islam.

But those are separate arguments. My concern this week is whether we in the media are only too willing to run stories that show Islam in a reactionary light. In this case, because no statement – let alone a fatwa – was issued, somebody must have gone through the question and answer section on the website to find something provocative before writing the story. By the time Darul Uloom issued a denial and made it clear that there was no fatwa, it was too late. The damage had been done.

I can understand why stories about Muslim intolerance are readily believed. Though this is no reflection on the community as a whole, there is no doubt that the clergy has its share of publicity hounds who will issue absurd proclamations in the hope of attracting some attention to themselves. And while an important school of Islam that was trying to be regarded as liberal could not have issued this fatwa, some small-time preacher could easily have issued something very like it.

Nevertheless, I understand Hamid’s frustrations. Liberal Muslims are fed up of the lunatics within their own community who are determined to drag Islam back to the middle ages. They are annoyed also by the tendency of the media to regard any publicity-hungry clergyman as worthy of interest.

But when false stories appear; when non-existent fatwas are reported; and when the media seem to go out of their way to look for instances of intolerance, liberals have a right to get angry.

So, for everyone who has written in asking for a comment about the fatwa, here’s my response: fatwa? What fatwa?

BY VIR SANGHVI


source : http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/medium-term/2010/05/18/fatwa-what-fatwa/#more-237

Google Phone

Monday, December 14, 2009 · 0 comments

Google Phone



GN-2

Google Phone’s Existence Confirmed; It’s Unlocked, Thinner Than iPhone

· 0 comments

Google Phone’s Existence Confirmed; It’s Unlocked, Thinner Than iPhone


SOURCE : www.wired.com

At last, the Googlephone has appeared. Forget the Droid, the G1 and all those other Android wannabees: Google is testing its own handset, the search giant confirmed over the weekend.

Although Google did not specify details on the phone or its plans to sell it, numerous sources have fleshed out the picture. The handset is designed by Google, made by hardware partner HTC, is running Android 2.1, and is called the Nexus One, according to multiple sources including the Wall Street Journal, TechCrunch, Daring Fireball, and leaked photos. The phone will be sold online by Google itself, the AllThingsD reports.

The Nexus One will, crucially, be sold unlocked, according to TechCrunch, giving Google complete control over the hardware and software with no pesky carrier interference. Even the iPhone, which has had almost unprecedented autonomy in its functionality is still constrained by carriers: AT&T’s anti-tethering paranoia is a good example.

Although not yet officially announced, Google has coyly admitted that the phone is real. In fact, it has provided the handset to its employees in order to test it out in the wild. The Google Mobile Blog explains, somewhat cryptically:

We recently came up with the concept of a mobile lab, which is a device that combines innovative hardware from a partner with software that runs on Android to experiment with new mobile features and capabilities, and we shared this device with Google employees across the globe. This means they get to test out a new technology and help improve it.

Unfortunately, because dogfooding is a process exclusively for Google employees, we cannot share specific product details. We hope to share more after our dogfood diet.

The phone is already in use, and website log data suggest it is running Android 2.1. Nerdy John Gruber of Daring Fireball found this user agent string in his site’s logs:

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1; en-us; Nexus One Build/ERD56C) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17

It makes sense to identify yourself as Mobile Safari, if only to get proper mobile Webkit pages served to you.

google phone nexus one htc

Characteristically, and in contrast to Apple’s secrecy, photos of the Googlephone are already being posted openly by Googlers, or being handed to their friends. The picture above, posted on Twitpic by blogger Cory O’Brien, shows the handset (taken on an iPhone and with a BlackBerry in the background). According to O’Brien, “Google Phone = iPhone + a little extra screen and a scroll wheel. Great touch screen, and Android.”

The hardware specs are also leaking. Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch says that the Nexus will run onQualcomm’s speedy Snapdragon chip, sport an OLED display, be thinner than the iPhone (with no physical keyboard) and feature two microphones along with a “weirdly large” camera.

Those hoping to get an iPhone-caliber phone on Verizon are out of luck. The Nexus will be a GSM phone, which means T-Mobile and AT&T in the United States. Worse, if you do opt for AT&T, your data connection could be EDGE-only. Gruber again, from Twitter: “The bummer I’m hearing about Nexus One: it’s GSM and unlocked, but on T-Mobile’s 3G band, so it works on AT&T but EDGE-only.”

According to the Media Memo blog at AllThingsD, the choice to use GSM was prompted by Verizon’s refusal to carry the Nexus. Verizon already sells the Android-based Droid, but this odd decision looks like a repeat of the one made when the carrier turned down the iPhone.

This may turn out to be a Zune-like move, where Microsoft alienated hardware makers by ignoring PlaysForSure in favor of its own new DRM scheme. Or the Nexus could be a light that burns twice as bright as all the existing confusion of Android handsets combined, thus building a brand that can rival the iPhone. Either way, we won’t have to wait for long to see. The Nexus should be on sale in early January, and if these last two days are any indication, then Googlers will have “leaked” all the hardware and software well before the launch.

Google Confirms Plans to Release Its Own Smartphone

· 0 comments

Google Confirms Plans to Release Its Own Smartphone

SOURCE : REUTERSReuters


Google Confirms Plans to Release Its Own Smartphone
Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:20am EST
More from Wired
Editors' Picks for the Wired.com Sleep Photo Contest
24 Nov 2009
- Wired.com

At last, the Googlephone has appeared. Forget the Droid, the G1 and all those other Android wannabees. Google will begin to sell its own reference Android 2.1 handset, designed by Google, made by hardware partner HTC, and called the Nexus One. The phone will be sold online by Google itself.

The Nexus One will, crucially, be sold unlocked, giving Google complete control over the hardware and software with no pesky carrier interference. Even the iPhone, which has had almost unprecedented autonomy in its functionality is still constrained by carriers: AT&T’s anti-tethering paranoia is a good example.

Although not yet officially announced, Google has coyly admitted that the phone is real and will be on sale early in the new year. In fact, it has provided the handset to its employees in order to test it out in the wild. The Google Mobile Blog explains, somewhat cryptically:

We recently came up with the concept of a mobile lab, which is a device that combines innovative hardware from a partner with software that runs on Android to experiment with new mobile features and capabilities, and we shared this device with Google employees across the globe. This means they get to test out a new technology and help improve it.

Unfortunately, because dogfooding is a process exclusively for Google employees, we cannot share specific product details. We hope to share more after our dogfood diet.

The phone is already in use. Nerdy John Gruber of Daring Fireball found this user agent string in his site’s logs:

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1; en-us; Nexus One Build/ERD56C) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17

It makes sense to identify yourself as Mobile Safari, if only to get proper mobile Webkit pages served to you.

Characteristically, and in contrast to Apple’s secrecy, photos of the Googlephone are already being posted openly by Googlers, or being handed to their friends. The picture above, posted on Twitpic by blogger Cory O’Brien, shows the handset (taken on an iPhone and with a BlackBerry in the background). According to O’Brien, “Google Phone = iPhone + a little extra screen and a scroll wheel. Great touch screen, and Android”.

The hardware specs are also leaking. Erick Schonfeld at TechCrunch says that the Nexus will run on Qualcomm’s speedy Snapdragon chip, sport an OLED display, be thinner than the iPhone (with no physical keyboard) and feature two microphones along with a “weirdly large” camera.

Those hoping to get an iPhone-caliber phone on Verizon are out of luck. The Nexus will be a GSM phone, which means T-Mobile and AT&T in the US. Worse, if you do opt for AT&T, your data connection could be EDGE-only. Gruber again, from Twitter.

The bummer I’m hearing about Nexus One: it’s GSM and unlocked, but on T-Mobile’s 3G band, so it works on AT&T but EDGE-only.

According to the Media Memo blog at the Wall Street Journal, the choice to use GSM was prompted by Verizon’s refusal to carry the Nexus. Verizon already sells the Android-based Droid, but this odd decision looks like a repeat of the one made when the carrier turned down the iPhone.

This may turn out to be a Zune-like move, where Microsoft alienated hardware makers by ignoring PlaysForSure in favor of its own new DRM scheme. Or the Nexus could be a light that burns twice as bright as all the existing confusion of Android handsets combined, thus building a brand that can rival the iPhone. Either way, we won’t have to wait for long to see. The Nexus should be on sale in early January, and if these last two days are any indication, then Googlers will have “leaked” all the hardware and software well before the launch.

An Android dogfood diet for the holidays [Google Mobile Blog]

Photo credit: Cory O’Brien

Google tests new phone to profit from mobile Web

· 0 comments

SOURCE :

Google tests new phone to profit from mobile Web

SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc. is determined to gain more influence over how the Web is used on mobile phones, even if the next step in the quest tramples some of the relationships forged during its two-year expansion into the wireless industry.

The focus on Google's mobile ambitions is sharpening now that the Internet search leader is working on a new phone called "Nexus One." The handset is being tested by Google's 20,000 employees, who received the device just before the weekend.

Google declined to comment on the reason for the Nexus One's development.

But The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times have described the employee testing as a prelude to selling the phone directly to consumers early next year.

The phone — manufactured by Taiwan's HTC Corp. — wouldn't be tied to a specific carrier, unlike other devices using Google's mobile operating system, "Android." The autonomy of a so-called "unlocked" mobile phone could give consumers more freedom to select the carrier of their choice, although the unique technology running competing U.S. wireless networks will probably limit the options.

It's not clear how wide-ranging Google's ambitions are for the phone. Unless Google is willing to sell the phone at a loss, the Nexus One is likely to be much more expensive than Apple's iPhone and similar devices, which receive subsidies from wireless carriers.

With those subsidies, most "smart" phones sell for $50 to $200, instead of the $400 to $600 price they'd have without the financial aid. The carriers recover their expense through service plans that cost $800 to $1,000 a year.

Without a sharp discount, Nexus One won't make much of a dent in the mobile phone market, predicted Forrester Research analyst Charles Golvin.

Google, which is based in Mountain View, started selling an unlocked version of the first "Android phone," T-Mobile's G1, for $399 last year. It was aimed at Android developers, but anyone who registered as such could buy one.

If it intend to keep the Nexus One's price low enough to pique consumer interest and protect its earnings, Google might still have to negotiate subsidies from wireless carriers — an arrangement that wouldn't change the status quo.

Or Google could be hoping to generate enough revenue from ads shown on mobile Web sites and applications downloaded on the Nexus One to cover the cost of any discounts.

But the mobile advertising market in the U.S. is still small, with $416 million in revenue expected this year, according to research firm eMarketer Inc. In the United States, Google generates more than $10 billion annually from the sale of online ads shown on personal computers.

Google hopes to improve its mobile advertising network with the $750 million acquisition of AdMob, a pioneer in the field. That deal is expected to close early next year.

"Mobile is clearly the next big business opportunity and (Google) wants to do everything possible to control its own destiny," Golvin said.

Selling equipment would mark a significant shift for Google, which has consistently said it prefers to leave the design and marketing of smart phones to manufacturers and carriers that have embraced Android since the system's November 2007 introduction.

At that time, Google downplayed the need for a "Gphone," saying its mobile software and alliance with dozens of partners have a bigger impact on the market than any single device.

Android has given Google a strong foothold in the mobile market, although it's not nearly as large the one Apple has carved out while selling more than 30 million iPhones during the past 2 1/2 years.

Motorola Inc. is pinning its smart-phone hopes on the Android and Verizon Wireless has thrown its weight behind phones running on the Google software, too. Over the past month, Verizon has been heavily promoting the Google-powered Droid phone as a compelling alternative to the iPhone.

William Blair & Co. analyst Anil Doradla believes Google may alienate some of its partners and thwart Android's expansion by selling its own phone.

"Given that Android is still in its initial stages of deployment, Google needs all the good will it can get to ensure success," Doradla wrote in a Monday research note.

Verizon Wireless said it isn't upset about Nexus One yet.

"We are still looking at different possibilities with our friend Google," Verizon spokesman Jeffrey Nelson said.

If Google decides to sell its own handset, it would intensify its budding rivalry with Apple, a former ally that shared antipathy toward Microsoft Corp. Apple spokeswoman Natalie Harrison declined to comment Monday on the Nexus One.

Google shares gained $5.22 to close Monday at $595.73 trading, while Apple shares increased $2.31 to $196.98.

The brewing competition between Google and Apple sparked a Federal Trade Competition inquiry into the two common directors the companies shared on their boards. That was resolved when Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt resigned from Apple's board in August and Genentech Chairman Arthur Levinson quit Google's board in October.

The iPhone has been the biggest source of mobile traffic to Google's mobile services during the past two years, according to Google executives.

Nexus One apparently is a reference to a line of replicants, or androids, in the 1982 science fiction film "Blade Runner." Its name was confirmed in a Federal Communications Commission filing released Monday.

Based on Internet photos of the phone, Nexus One will run several Google applications, including a recently introduced feature that lets mobile users submit pictures of landmarks, products and other objects to get a pertinent list of search results.

The FCC filing indicated the Nexus One will be compatible with many networks overseas, but T-Mobile has the only 3G network that would support it in the U.S. It would only take minor tweaking to make it work on AT&T Inc.'s 3G network in the U.S. as well, Golvin said.

T-Mobile declined to comment on the Nexus One.

AP Technology Writer Peter Svensson in New York contributed to this story.

India has 500 million mobile phone numbers

· 0 comments

India has 500 million mobile phone numbers

SOURCE :
The Times of India




NEW DELHI: By the start of the New Year, India will have breached a previously unthinkable landmark — half a billion wireless connections — making it the second largest group of mobile phone users after China.

Overall, telephone connections in India (fixed line and wireless) will be closing in on 550 million by the time you read this. This translates into a teledensity (phone connections per 100 population) of roughly 45%, an urban teledensity closer to 97% and a rural teledensity of about 18%.

India had crossed 488.40 million wireless connections at the end of October 2009 and will be breaching the half-billion wireless connections mark just about now. Yet, the actual number of subscribers might be less than half a billion, since a few hold multiple SIM cards and not all of them are in use at the same time.

In sharp contrast, wireline connectivity is down to 37.25 million phones, exhibiting a clear consumer preference for wireless, including mobile phones, as a preferred technology for voice and data communications. India’s broadband penetration, however, is abysmally low at 7.5 million — a consequence, say telecom experts, of policy failure, partly due to the declining use of wireline phones.

India’s telephony growth is remarkable despite the fact that the last two years have been full of controversy and litigation, with government and industry divided on crucial issues like spectrum policy, tariffs and introduction of new competition.

India has 13 to 14 operators providing wireless connectivity — mostly mobile — in its 22 service areas. Of these, 8-9 companies are operational and another 5-6 are obligated to launch service to meet rollout obligations. Many of the new entrants who had bagged spectrum in January 2008 have been unable to get off the ground nearly two years after receiving licences.

Contact Us


Economic Times

My Blog List

About this blog

News,Blogs,Articles,Stories are everywhere, but there are few which brings Hope along with it ,there are peoples around the world working constantly to bring Justice, Peace and democracy, fighting for minorities right, fighting against corruptions, there are peoples bringing innovations and technology, there are games which brings joy to millions of fans, something which affects everyone of us, and bring hope in any society person or individual, this blog is about that HOPE and HUMANS RIGHTS

Site Sponsors